Aging

Mouse hypothalamus — circadian-adjusted aging (bulk RNA-seq)

Mus musculus · Whole hypothalamus · bulk RNA-seq

GSE201207
Explore this datasetView in dataset library

Selected data and study scope

This dataset contains bulk RNA-seq data from Mus musculus, sampled from whole hypothalamus. The default comparison examines gene expression in Aged (27 months) relative to Young (6 months).

The explorer includes 1 track and 1 comparison for this dataset.

The default track, Whole hypothalamus, includes 12 Young (6 months) samples and 12 Aged (27 months) samples in this comparison. These are analysis sample counts. Check the source for biological replication and pooling.

Interpretation and limitations

The measurement combines expression from the cells in the tissue sample. A difference in tissue expression alone does not identify which cell type contributes to it.

Expression values are CPM (TMM-normalized): counts per million on library sizes adjusted by the TMM factors of the study’s own edgeR fit. This scale adjusts for library size and composition, not gene length. Use it to inspect a feature across the samples in this analysis. CPM values are not absolute transcript counts.

Evidence and verification

Pipeline QC passed. Mouse hypothalamus — circadian-adjusted aging (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track hypothalamus

Experimental design passed. Mouse hypothalamus — circadian-adjusted aging (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track hypothalamus

Author concordance not assessed. Author effect concordance has not been assessed

Pipeline QC can pass while experimental-design limitations remain. Read both assessments before interpreting results.

Open the dataset in the Explorer to read each check and its evidence. Author concordance compares effects for matched genes. It does not require identical author P values or FDR.

Read the analysis methods and interpretation guide and how to cite the source study and HypoExplorer. The source publication may include tissues, groups or comparisons beyond the data shown here.

Source study

Hypothalamus, 6 vs 27 months, n=12 independent pooled libraries per age; common cycle-averaged age effect with 12-level circadian sampling time as a fixed block (Wolff et al., Cell Rep 2023, PMID 36640301; GSE201207)

Source publication

Defining the age-dependent and tissue-specific circadian transcriptome in male mice.

Wolff CA, Gutierrez-Monreal MA, Meng L, Zhang X, Douma LG, Costello HM, et al.

Cell reports · 2023

Repository study title

Defining the age-dependent and tissue-specific circadian transcriptome in male mice

The original study authors produced these data. HypoExplorer displays selected data and analyses that may cover only part of the study.

How to cite the dataset, publication and HypoExplorer

Comparisons in HypoExplorer

Aged (27 months) vs Young (6 months) · default

Baseline: Young (6 months) → Case: Aged (27 months)

Positive differential-expression values indicate higher expression in the case group relative to the baseline. Check the comparison direction and study design when interpreting results.

Available tracks

Detected features and sample counts for Aged (27 months) vs Young (6 months). Counts are specific to each track.
TrackFeaturesYoung (6 months) nAged (27 months) n
Whole hypothalamus20,5741212

Expression and analysis results

Open this dataset to inspect gene expression and differential-expression results across the available tracks. Pathway enrichment is also available. The pathway databases differ by dataset.

HypoExplorer is in beta testing. Features and analyses may change during testing. Review the original source, analysis methods and quality-control checks before using a result in research.