Mouse hypothalamus — pooled 14/17-day overfeeding effect (bulk RNA-seq)
Mus musculus · Whole hypothalamus · bulk RNA-seq
Selected data and study scope
This dataset contains bulk RNA-seq data from Mus musculus, sampled from whole hypothalamus. The default comparison examines gene expression in Overfeeding relative to Control.
The explorer estimates a common intragastric-overfeeding effect across days 14 and 17 in a model that includes day. The original publication reports the two days separately.
The explorer includes 1 track and 1 comparison for this dataset.
The default track, Whole hypothalamus, includes 12 Control samples and 12 Overfeeding samples in this comparison. These are analysis sample counts. Check the source for biological replication and pooling.
Interpretation and limitations
This pooled effect is an exploratory analysis. It should not be interpreted as either the day-14 or day-17 result from the publication.
The measurement combines expression from the cells in the tissue sample. A difference in tissue expression alone does not identify which cell type contributes to it.
Expression values are CPM (TMM-normalized): counts per million on library sizes adjusted by the TMM factors of the study’s own edgeR fit. This scale adjusts for library size and composition, not gene length. Use it to inspect a feature across the samples in this analysis. CPM values are not absolute transcript counts.
Evidence and verification
Pipeline QC review needed. Mouse hypothalamus — pooled 14/17-day overfeeding effect (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track hypothalamus
Experimental design passed. Mouse hypothalamus — pooled 14/17-day overfeeding effect (bulk RNA-seq); all 1 registered contrasts on default track hypothalamus
Author concordance not assessed. Author effect concordance has not been assessed
Pipeline QC can pass while experimental-design limitations remain. Read both assessments before interpreting results.
Open the dataset in the Explorer to read each check and its evidence. Author concordance compares effects for matched genes. It does not require identical author P values or FDR.
Read the analysis methods and interpretation guide and how to cite the source study and HypoExplorer. The source publication may include tissues, groups or comparisons beyond the data shown here.
Source study
Exploratory common intragastric-overfeeding effect pooled across days 14 and 17 versus control; authors report the days separately (GSE247825)
Source publication
Lund C, Ranea-Robles P, Falk S, Rausch DM, Skovbjerg G, Vibe-Petersen VK, et al.
Nature communications · 2024
Repository study title
Protection against overfeeding-induced weight gain in mice is preserved in obesity but does not require FGF21 or MC4R
The original study authors produced these data. HypoExplorer displays selected data and analyses that may cover only part of the study.
Comparisons in HypoExplorer
Overfeeding vs Control · default
Positive differential-expression values indicate higher expression in the case group relative to the baseline. Check the comparison direction and study design when interpreting results.
Available tracks
| Track | Features | Control n | Overfeeding n |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole hypothalamus | 18,263 | 12 | 12 |
Expression and analysis results
Open this dataset to inspect gene expression and differential-expression results across the available tracks. Pathway enrichment is also available. The pathway databases differ by dataset.
HypoExplorer is in beta testing. Features and analyses may change during testing. Review the original source, analysis methods and quality-control checks before using a result in research.